<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><pre>section: the-informer</pre><channel><title>Admiralty on Informer Archives</title><link>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/</link><description>Recent content by The Informer</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 08:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Admiralty - Why?</title><link>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/why/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:21:01 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/why/</guid><description>Yes, the admiralty Rules are all in Title 28 now. I have all the original admiralty rules and the books on where they all are now. They are horrendously large in volume. To start with read Southworth Machinery Co. Inc vs F/V Corey Pride, et al 1993 AMC 2261 wherein they say UCC is a source of Admiralty law and UCC is considered a source for federal admiralty law. That will get you going.</description></item><item><title>Admiralty in Tax Cases</title><link>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/admiralty-in-tax-cases/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:28:04 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/admiralty-in-tax-cases/</guid><description>Even though you research all the code sections, the bottom line is you will find the admiralty/maritime applies to &amp;ldquo;all revenue cases&amp;rdquo; as so stated in the court decision in the Huntress.
None of admiralty is mentioned in the statutes because it is axiomatic that it deals with admiralty procedures. For this is proven in the Huntress when the Judge stated;
If in the clause in the constitution, repeated in the judiciary act, &amp;ldquo;all causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,&amp;rdquo; the word &amp;ldquo;maritime&amp;rdquo; has any meaning and was not used merely for the purpose of rounding the phrase, it must include such a contract; and we are not gratuitously to suppose that words, in the constitution, were used without meaning.</description></item><item><title>Admiralty Rules</title><link>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/admiralty-rules/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 07:45:43 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.informerarchives.com/the-informer/admiralty/admiralty-rules/</guid><description>I have taken the time to search all the statutes on the fact that 28 USC is in fact where all the Admiralty Rules lie, not just the supplemental Rules as 99 percent of people think.
Title 28 IS the statute for admiralty when you read the intro chapters in the very beginning of Title 28. So here are the Admiralty Rules and the Title 28 Rule where they now lie.</description></item></channel></rss>